We need more option to the debating structure

with opposing topic of

There are sufficient options to debates


Creator
Coveny
Creator is trying to prove:
We need more option to the debating structure
Cr1A
Style Elo
Random Elo (if applicable)
Tournament Elo (if applicable)
Contender
Ragnar
Contender is trying to prove:
There are sufficient options to debates
Con1A
Con1B
Style Elo
Random Elo (if applicable)
Tournament Elo (if applicable)
Settings for this debate
Category : Games Tags :
Civil or Profane : Civil Casual or Ranked Casual
Style Speed Voting Period 2 Days
Characters per round : 500 Time to respond : 1 Days
Judging score Required : 0 Debate Id #8
Share with friends :
Opinion on this debate :
Creator Conduct : Contender Conduct :
Code of Conduct page Debate Rules
Link to debates page Link Elo calculations
Rules Clarification

Debate starts!

Acceptance Round
Total Points: 0 Total Points: 0
Accepted Accepted
Argument Round
0
  
0
0
0
  
0
0

Debating is about options and freedom. While not every debate option will be something that every debator will be interested in, having more options allows people the freedom to choose what works for them. So we will always need more options when debating! 

You have not responded in the allotted amount of time, and forfeit this round.
Closing and Summary Round
0
  
0
0
0
  
0
0

Ragnar indicated that he couldn't submit anything for the first round. I submit that Ragnar didn't log in before he tried to enter text so it looked like FD knew who he was ... but FD did know.

You have not responded in the allotted amount of time, and forfeit this round.
Recent Comments
Write Your Comment.



You need to sign-in to make a comment.

Problems with the website: webhost[at]fordebating.com


Copyright © 2018 - ForDebating.com , All rights reserved.